INTRODUCTION
I
Of all the great French authors
perhaps Montesquieu is the least known in this country. It is more than
a hundred years since any work of his was translated into English, and
no greater sign of the neglect which has befallen him could be instanced
than the infrequency of the appearance of his name in our periodical and
journalistic literature, at a time when our ideas of government are once
more in the crucible. The greater fame of Voltaire and Rousseau,
and the absorbing interest of the French Revolution, are the principal
causes of this neglect; at the same time, had there been anything in the
shape of a true biography of Montesquieu, a living picture of the man,
the operation of these causes might have been in some degree obviated.
It was the custom under
the ancien régime in the great law-families for the eldest
son to compose a life of his father: a document designed to hide the actual
man behind a mask of the domestic and legal virtues so effectually that
his friends and colleagues should be unable to recognize him. Such
a mémoire pour servir in the highest style of the art, Montesquieu’s
son prepared and published in 1755. The eulogies of D’Alembert, Maupertuis,
and the Chevalier de Solignac, founded, all of them, so far as they refer
to Montesquieu’s life, upon this filial effigy, represent only a mask with
the conventional air proper to a great and good man.
This lack of a truthful
picture has, of course, had a bad effect on Montesquieu’s fame in France
as well as in England. Least known, until recently, as regards his
life, of all the great Frenchmen of the eighteenth century, he has had
perhaps the most varied fortune of all writers of that or any other age.
For about fifty years after his death, his reputation was unrivalled; but
from 1789 till 1814, the alterations of feeling towards him in France were
as extravagant as if he had been a living agent in the Revolution and its
sequel, “now extolled to the clouds as the master of political science,
as the man of genius who had rediscovered the title-deeds of the human
race; now denounced as laudator temporis acti, the apostle of privilege,
and the defender of abuses.” Abandoned and condemned in evil times,
he has always reappeared when France has recognized its truest interests.
Under the Consulate and the First Empire he is intentionally forgotten,
but in 1814 he comes to the front once more. Publishers and editors
were seized about that time with a “sort of fury” for the works of Montesquieu,
and from 1819 till 1834 numerous annotated editions appeared. Then
again there came a period of eclipse, and it was not until the close of
the Second Empire that France, once more free, resumed the study of him
who first tried to show it what freedom meant.
In 1875 M. Edouard Laboulaye’s
edition of Montesquieu’s works, perhaps the best, was published in seven
volumes; and in 1878 M. Louis Vian issued his “Histoire de Montesquieu,”
the most important work on Montesquieu that has yet appeared. M.
Vian had access to much unpublished matter; and his book, which is the
result of fifteen years of study and research, supplies that biography
for want of which Montesquieu's personality has hitherto been as vague
as a spectre. In short, they seem at last in France in a fair way
to get something like the true focus of Montesquieu, to have him placed
in his proper niche: to understand him, even to label him, for he is not
one of the very greatest whom it is criminal, and indeed impossible, to
docket and define until one can look at them through the thought of many
generations.
It is from M. Vian’s biography
that the material for this introduction is mainly drawn. The writer
is also indebted to M. Albert Sorel’s monograph on Montesquieu, and to
the prefaces of M. Laboulaye. For the translation, the editions used
were those of M. Laboulaye and M. Tourneux, the text of the former having
been followed as a rule: the notes in both have been found very serviceable.